Search for: "Steven A Shapiro" Results 301 - 320 of 379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist and Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, and First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
” And at Cato @ Liberty, Ilya Shapiro describes Alderman as one example of how the Supreme Court’s “non-rulings” can be “more important that the cases it actually hears. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
”  Steven Mazie weighs in as well, contending that, “however the justices are about to rule, court commentary from the president’s bully pulpit is, at best, fruitless. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
” In another post at Cato, Ilya Shapiro and Julio Columba discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in support of the appeal brief in a Texas voting rights case. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
” Also from the Senate documents, Bloomberg notes that Kagan’s talks with the White House about a possible vacancy on the Court and nomination preceded Justice Stevens’ retirement announcement on April 9 by about a month. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Anna Christensen
  In a second WSJ piece, Bravin looks back at Justice Stevens’ legacy. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[t]he justices have bought themselves some time, but they are unlikely to find relief from the question of how far legislatures can go in rigging elections. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Greenspun and Jonathan Shapiro were ineffective because they failed to object to Muhammad's demand to represent himself at trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for USA Today, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on the decision, which he describes as  “[p]robably the most misunderstood case in modern legal history. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Steven Hauk, fails to replace him on-air with Hauk’s own safe, unfunny jokes. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Coverage of Dan’s City comes from Steven D. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie finds it “telling that the briefs supporting Mr Trump’s immigration decisions expend more energy imploring the justices to look away rather than to carefully examine the justifications and motives behind the travel restrictions. [read post]