Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 301 - 320
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 4:10 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie asks whether, with “Neil Gorsuch now in Antonin Scalia’s old chair and retirement rumours flying about Anthony Kennedy, the 80-year-old perennial swing justice,” “Chief Justice Roberts [could] be emerging as the court’s new median vote,” noting that although a “wider look at … Roberts’s record does not suggest even-handedness,” “in one of the most politicised eras of the… [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
” Supreme Court reporter and teacher Steven Mazie gives a video rundown on how the coronavirus pandemic is affecting the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Julia Edwards Ainsley and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Richard Wolf at USA Today, and Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks ahead to next week’s oral argument in the challenge to the University of Texas at Austin’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process, describing it as a “dispute over what diversity means. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:58 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie considers Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s decision not to join Thomas in voting to hear the cases, suggesting that “it is no particular surprise that Justice Kavanaugh is cultivating a low profile, heading off conflicts involving poor women’s access to reproductive health services so early in his tenure,” and cautioning that “[t]t would be a mistake to read too much into a single vote… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am
Coverage of Tuesday’s other argument, a challenge to Florida’s death penalty sentencing scheme, comes from Sam Hananel of the Associated Press (via The Gainesville Sun), with commentary from Steven Mazie for The Economist. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:22 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie contends that, with the Court’s recent refusal to hear a challenge to Seattle’s new minimum-wage law, “cities have the green light to legislate for higher wages, even as the national debate over wage policy becomes a point of contestation in the presidential campaign. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
And Steven Mazie discusses the argument in Foster v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on this week’s oral argument in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie focuses on the four words at the heart of the challenge – “established by the State” – and argues that the case should be summarized as one in which “the Supreme Court will decide whether to let millions of Americans pay the price for their legislators’ shoddy draftsmanship. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
” Other commentary addresses specific elements of Scalia’s legacy: his originalism, at All Things Considered; his Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, by Jonathan Blanks at Cato at Liberty; his influence on state and local governance, by Lisa Soronen of Knowledge Center for The Counsel of State Governments; his libertarian jurisprudence, by Ilya Shapiro at Reason.com; and his more liberal jurisprudence, by Steven Mazie at Big Think. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
In his column for The Economist, Steven Mazie considers the four-four affirmance in Friedrichs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie provides commentary on the Affordable Care Act at the Supreme Court more generally. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that although “[t]he justices, wary of covid-19’s threat, have themselves suspended hearings for the first time since 1918,” in Republican National Committee v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
Chatman, holding by a vote of seven to one that the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision that the defendant failed to show purposeful race discrimination in the selection of his jury was clearly erroneous, comes from Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription or registration required); commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Janell Ross for The Washington Post, Steven Mazie in The Economist, and Garrett Epps in The Atlantic. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that after last week’s oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:32 am
Supreme Court Hears His Claim (Nina Totenberg, NPR) The Supreme Court Must Choose Between Trump and the Constitution in the Census Case (David Gans, Slate) Trump’s plan to shift congressional seats reaches the Supreme Court (Steven Mazie, The Economist) Supreme Court considers Trump’s plan to adjust census based on immigration status (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Trump Administration Backs Oil Industry in SCOTUS Climate Case (Ellen Gilmer, Bloomberg Law) Open the Bar:… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, with commentary coming from Richard Epstein at Ricochet, Steven Mazie in The Economist, Harlan Elrich – one of the plaintiffs in the case – in The Wall Street Journal, and the Center for Individual Rights (which discusses Elrich’s op-ed). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie explains that “it is far from obvious how the justices will rule in these disputes. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
In The Economist’s “explainer” series, Steven Mazie explains how the Court selects its cases. [read post]
