Search for: "Still v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 49,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
While States have substantial authority to regulate land use, see Village of Euclid v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm by Michael Oykhman
Thus, one example would be that the accused submitted a false report on a prohibited firearm, stating that it was stolen, when it was still in the possession of the accused. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
Important to note for client privacy purposes, a 501(c) (4) is not required to disclose the names of its donors.[13] However, depending on what state the 501(c)(4) operates, such information may be requested by such state, but public disclosure of donor information is still a grey area which is arguably invalid on federal or state constitutional grounds.[14] Florida does not currently expand any required federal disclosures, which may mean there is a desire by the… [read post]
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Numerous people still, after all these years, oppose women’s use of contraception.Cafeteria Catholics do not. [read post]