Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
² Strickland v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 6:56 pm
Cummings v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
From a new decision by the Eighth Circuit, Donnell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Strickland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Yarborough v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:11 pm
McNeal 13-963 Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:43 am
But the Second Circuit got a heaping pile of weird in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:12 pm
Citing the case of United States v. [read post]
