Search for: "Strickland v. Washington"
Results 301 - 320
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2012, 11:32 am
This case was Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:59 am
It's complicated.The standard was set in the landmark case of Strickland v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Washington and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:40 am
This case, however, is not the one to make that rule given the Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
In its decision, the court also reaffirmed the standard established in Strickland v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
As Wikipedia notes, in Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 am
Id., 131 S.Ct. at 786.Even without the deference due under § 2254, the Strickland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Massachusetts 14-1153Issue: Whether a defendant asserting ineffective assistance under Strickland v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 ( 1984 ). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
² Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:51 am
Washington’s (466 U. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Washington. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
