Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 301 - 320 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
New York City, 08-969), and a state legislature’s power to bar federal courts from ruling on class action cases that are based on state law claims (Shady Grove Orthopedic Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 240 (1990) (reaffirming this principle as to “prior restraint[s] in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits”); State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:02 pm
"  Here are excerpts from the lengthy essay:This coming term, the Supreme Court will consider the important companion cases of Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:19 am by Phil Cave
My Liege Dwight Sullivan may remember this case from our days together at Appellate Defense, United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
Circuit stayed a decision by Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]