Search for: "Summers v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Not until the parent becomes unable to care for the children, holds the New Jersey Superior Court in A.W. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am by Susan Brenner
Howard, 2013 WL 4792843 (Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division 2013). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
He filed for divorce in Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2010, That action was pending. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently addressed this issue in Bondfield Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
And now we have a lengthy Superior Court decision from earlier this summer (Matthews v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Given the Seventh Circuit’s reliance on its earlier opinion in Hatmaker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 11:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Ouch.This time, student got fed up, and invoked the lesser deity of the superior court appeal. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]