Search for: "Sweet v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
The style of the case is Why Nada Cruz, L.L.C. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
" United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:33 pm
Young v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In the present case, the goods were sweet, fast-food low priced products for everyday consumption targeted at the general public. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Q. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
In Falbo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:19 am
The plaintiff's Website also asserts that the defendant previously promised not to use the Twitter account to say sweet things about technology companies other than PhoneDog. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:28 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al., 1-09-cv-04515 (NYSD March 29, 2010, Opinion) (Sweet, J.) [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
Olivia de Havilland, DBE v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
Neko was known to be affectionate and sweet. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:38 am
Sweet, 195 N.J. 357, 370 (2008) (quoting State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:20 am
Listen to: Morgan (Estate) v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Apparently it's pretty sweet being a lawyer there. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:16 am
And if there’s any lingering doubts, tell everyone to look up State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:50 pm
Supreme Court in Berger v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
Why involve some sheik from Saudi Arabia, a London solicitor living in his Mum's basement and a couple former Congressmen to deliver a bushel of sweet potatoes? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Redd v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm
With Steyn J stating that the appeal has a “real prospect of success”, it appears that Cadwalladr is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:34 am
—Tony Kanal 1Wailua Associates v. [read post]