Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 301 - 320 of 4,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
They don't need the protection of the per se rule in order to enforce [their power]. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protecion Bureau v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:51 am by admin
  Some of the highlights of this debate have included announcements by the Competition Bureau that it is stepping up its advocacy efforts in certain regulated sectors (e.g., health, wireless, etc.) [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
While names of menu items don’t make for particularly strong marks, plenty of precedent exists for granting them protection. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
This legal protection will increase consumer willingness to switch products as what they use will not impact how they are protected. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
  On the consumer side, there is no overarching law to protect private data. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consumers might have their own claims, or the gov’t might intervene on behalf of consumers to protect them. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:24 am by Montgomery McCracken
Just a reminder that there’s still time to register for today’s webinar, “Telephone Consumer Protection Act Update: The Year in Review and Trends for 2015. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs sued, alleging California, New Jersey, and New York consumer protection claims. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:45 am
Plaintiff-appellants sued for false advertising under the Lanham Act and various state consumer protection laws. [read post]