Search for: "TECHNICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC."
Results 301 - 320
of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 8:11 pm
Regarding the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement, Standard Innovation asserts that its We-Vibe ® family of products (We-Vibe, We-Vibe II and We-Vibe 3) practices the ‘605 and ‘779 patents. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
All the big tech companies that sell MS software with their products should be in on this too. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm
Phil Hartstein, President and CEO, Finjan Holdings, Inc.Phil is President and Chief Executive Officer of Finjan Holdings, Inc. and oversees the direction and management of current assets and future investments as well as working with the company’s executive management team to execute the shareholders vision as a public technology company. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (2000) 529 U.S. 861 finding preemption of a product claim based on failure to install air bags, where FMVSS 208 allowed installation of air bags or other passive restraints. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:13 am
Kraft General Foods, Inc., 62 F.3d 368 (11th Cir. 1995), a class of plaintiffs challenged the release used in connection with a plant closing, arguing that the employer should have provided information – i.e., ages and job titles – of individuals employed at other plants if the company "considered for closure several plants producing similar products" and if "employees at other plants may assume some of the functions of the closed plant. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:06 am
The breach included data held by Equifax Inc in connection with two of Equifax’s products. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:32 am
Google Inc., 234 F.R.D. 674 (N.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Some companies may issue press releases, or send unsolicited faxes or spam emails that might include: Claims to have products or technologies that are effective in remediating oil spills or restoring the eco-system Mention of contracts or expected contracts with BP, formerly British Petroleum, that will aid the cleanup effort Claims that the company is providing technical assistance or expertise to BP or to U.S. government agencies such as the Coast Guard or the… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Some companies may issue press releases, or send unsolicited faxes or spam emails that might include: Claims to have products or technologies that are effective in remediating oil spills or restoring the eco-system Mention of contracts or expected contracts with BP, formerly British Petroleum, that will aid the cleanup effort Claims that the company is providing technical assistance or expertise to BP or to U.S. government agencies such as the Coast Guard or the… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Some of these companies may not technically be startups, but I'm measuring the same data each month, so the year-to-year comparisons are valid. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:18 pm
Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The following companies are eligible to participate: Apex Virginia Offshore Wind, LLC; Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Virginia Power); Energy Management, Inc.; EDF Renewable Development, Inc.; Fisherman's Energy, LLC; IBERDROLA RENEWABLES, Inc.; Sea Breeze Energy, LLC; and Orisol Energy U.S., Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Grace & Company, Inc., Alvin H. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 4:45 pm
The case focuses on an open source business model based primarily on providing technical services. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:39 pm
The Complainant in this investigation was John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. d/b/a PPC, Inc. [read post]
TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed
16 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Neo4j, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:21 pm
As to the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement, the complaint asserts that ink cartridges from the following HP product families practice the asserted claims of the HP Patents: HP 21, HP 22, HP 27, HP 28, HP 54, HP 56, HP 57, HP 58, and HP 59. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
Companies seeking to evaluate risk around PFAS should look carefully at ingredients and warning language to determine whether disclosures are adequate. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:40 am
I have finally finished reading SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd (the IPKat beat me to it). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
