Search for: "THE FIRST INSURANCE CO., LTD." Results 301 - 320 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
Service charges In Green v 180 Archway Road Management Co Ltd [2012] UKUT 245 (LC), the lease provided for the landlord to insure the building in the joint names of himself and the leaseholders. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
Service charges In Green v 180 Archway Road Management Co Ltd [2012] UKUT 245 (LC), the lease provided for the landlord to insure the building in the joint names of himself and the leaseholders. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from the flat… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from the flat… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
He purchased insurance coverage for the house through the Meadow-North Agencies Ltd., an insurance agency. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The first is Okpabi and Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Anor. [read post]