Search for: "THE FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION"
Results 301 - 320
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” Bluntly, if we are talking about corporations in a formal sense, corporations do not have religious liberty rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
Use of data is creeping into every facet of our life—policing, lending, government benefits, insurance coverage. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am
” Clement disagreed, referring to the legislative history surrounding the RFRA and the Religious Liberty Protection Act and arguing that Congress understood RFRA to cover a for-profit corporation, albeit only a small set of corporations such as an incorporated Kosher market or deli. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
But when we have a First Amendment issue of — of this consequence, shouldn't we indicate that it's for the Congress, not the agency to determine that this corporation gets the exemption on that one, and not even for RFRA purposes, for other purposes.This is extremely important. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Anastasia Boden weighs in in support of the challengers to the mandate, as do Roger Pilon and Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
First, Hobby Lobby provokes some of the same ideological druthers as other cases involving laws that restrict corporations to a greater degree than they restrict natural persons. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
Especially after Justice Kagan expressed doubt about the contention that for-profit corporations are barred from making such claims as a threshold matter, the government's argument against the ability of for-profit corporations to ever bring or prevail in religious liberty cases seemed to face serious opposition. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:18 am
Will eating habits collected by smart fridges be repackaged and sold to healthcare or insurance companies as predictors of obesity or other health problems -- and so a reasonable basis for determining premiums? [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided that neither the company, Conestoga Wood Specialties, nor its owners could claim First Amendment religious rights — because, it found, the corporation is incapable of doing so, and because the owners had chosen the corporate form for their business and it stands apart from their personal interests. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Questions The First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:12 am
Then, we’ll move into the substantive areas of privacy law to hone in on the first year, including how to implement these new practice areas within a global organization. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:31 pm
The CGL policy, which Joule purchased from Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation, contained an “employer’s liability exclusion. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
A government makes it possible for markets to exist in the first place, by creating and enforcing laws regarding property, contracts, corporations, and so on, and then by enforcing those laws with both civil and criminal sanctions. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
The signers to the religion provisions of the First Amendment were united in a desire to protect the “liberty of conscience. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
The Greens believe that being required to provide health insurance that facilitates the use of such contraceptives is a substantial burden on their right to exercise their religion under RFRA, as well as under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am
The New York Times is a for-profit corporation, but no one would question the newspaper’s ability to exercise fully its First Amendment free speech rights. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
So why is central planning not only unwise, but dangerous to liberty? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
Those of us in the First Amendment area know well that Prof. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
That is not a recipe for promoting religious liberty. 2. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Meanwhile, numerous other cases present variations on Little Sisters—and two cases that are already on the Supreme Court docket present the related question of whether RFRA entitles owners of for-profit corporations to exemptions from Obamacare’s contraception insurance mandate for the corporations’ employees. [read post]
