Search for: "Tam v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Bill Summary The bill repeals Section 230’s immunity for publishing user-generated content with respect to state criminal prosecutions and civil claims related to CSAM. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Robert Liles
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Repealing the tax bar is an invitation to frivolous or excessive litigation In New York and Illinois, law firms have popped up filing dozens or even hundreds of qui tam cases, for instance filing against dozens of retailers prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
Randy Beck and John Langford argued for the revival of qui tam statutes as a check on executive officials. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]