Search for: "Taylor v. Williams" Results 301 - 320 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Finally, anyone interested in music or IP at a general level will find this collection fascinating. _________ [1] Williams v Gaye, 895 F (3d) 1106. [2] Hall v Swift, 786 Fed Appx 711 (Mem). [3] Kirbie Johnson, “Olivia Rodrigo, Paramore, and the Murky Tides of Copyright Infringement” Dazed (7 September 2021), online: <dazeddigital.com>. [4] Structured Asset Sales, LLC v Sheeran, 673 F Supp (3d) 415; Daniel Kreps, “Ed Sheeran Wins… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the… [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants charged in the indictment are: Sanyani Edwards, 32, of Taylor, Michigan and Angel Williams, 27, of Southfield, Michigan. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants charged in the indictment are: Sanyani Edwards, 32, of Taylor, Michigan and Angel Williams, 27, of Southfield, Michigan. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Congratulations to Kevin Taylor Baine (Williams & Connolly), who argued on behalf of the defendants. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 1: Audiovisual works – educational uses – colleges and universitiesThis proposed class would allow college and university faculty and students to circumvent access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures and other audiovisual works for purposes of criticism and comment. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which… [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Taylor Issue: Whether Department of Labor regulations preclude employees from waiving past claims, as opposed to future claims, under the Family Medical Leave Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Conor McEvily
  At this blog, Professor Steve Vladeck analyzes Elgin v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
  Meanwhile, Ben Conery of the Washington Times, Pete Williams of MSNBC, and the AP all cover Monday’s denial of cert. in Rodearmel v. [read post]