Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 301 - 320 of 21,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
The Courts present concern is as to the paternity of the plaintiff and whether the Defendant is his biological father. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
 Instead of continuing on that route, the plaintiff stepped on the parking lot to test its condition and found that it was firm. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
But the defining feature of a test case is that the plaintiffs are picked from among many and backed by larger organizations. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 pm by Carina Novell
Plaintiffs contended because the tests were administered under the control of WinCo, Plaintiffs must be categorized as employees (pursuant to California’s “control test,” which determines whether an employment relationship exists). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
When should the material contribution test apply In order to apply the material contribution test, instead of the "but for" test, it must be impossible for the Plaintiff to prove causation. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 9:52 pm by Shemia Fagan
In that case, the Ninth Circuit had applied the "place of operations" test, rather than the "nerve center," "center of activity," or "totality of the circumstances" tests favored in other circuits. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:21 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Court Finds that Car Dealership’s Insurance Policy Did Not Cover Customers on a Test-Drive, Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog, published August 7, 2018. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:31 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  Approximately two months before they moved out, the plaintiff was tested for lead, and the results indicated elevated levels of lead in her blood. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:43 pm by Amy Howe
To the contrary, at the same time that Congress added the “motivating factor” test to Title VII in 1991, it amended Section 1981 – but without adding the “motivating factor” test there as well. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:10 am by Will Matthews, ACLU
The truth is that not a single one of our six plaintiffs operates heavy machinery as part of their academic training. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:39 am
  Further, in most instances, the secret recording would be requested by the plaintiff’s attorney who was concerned about the impartiality of the defense neuropsychologist who is conducting the evaluation. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 6:56 am
Thomas-Rasset, the jury has returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $1,920,000.00, or $80,000.00 per song file. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
” Under Sullivan’s actual malice test, the plaintiff faced the daunting task of having to prove that the defendant made the libelous statement knowing that it was false or with reckless indifference as to its truth or falsity. [read post]