Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Movies, Inc."
Results 301 - 320
of 545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
Group W Productions, Inc., 955 P.2d 469, 486 (Cal. 1998), and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:19 am
” (Citing Universal City Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
Avon Prods., Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am
Cox Communications, Inc. et al). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
Ardy UCI Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology ClinicTisha Turk University of Minnesota, Morris IN OPPOSITIONBen Sheffner Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Playtime Theatres, Inc.. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
” In contrast, a bar’s purpose is to get people drunk. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
Patch v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
Campbell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The other, Ortiz v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
The People) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Copyright Group – Law professor defends alleged Hurt Locker pirates (TorrentFreak) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit: Bad faith intent to profit after innocent registration constitutes cybersquatting: DSPT Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
In a famous example, an agent of Columbia Pictures sent takedown notices for numerous Vimeo uploads—including the short film that originally inspired Columbia’s Pixels movie—simply for having the word “pixels” in their names.[4] The rights of wrongly accused Internet users, and of those who would read or watch their work, suffer as a result. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
But the news was not so good for last week’s other tax-discrimination petition, McLane Southern, Inc. v. [read post]
