Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 301 - 320 of 4,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
He then worked to boost the posts’ visibility, including: the posts asked users to “follow [his] link and mark it as helpful so that the message is amplified and as many people are warned as possible. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
On October 19, the Justice Department announced the indictment of six people for nineteen counts of securities fraud and money laundering. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am by INFORRM
 The defendant is represented by Jonathan Price, instructed by Kingsley Napley. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Coscia would then `repeat[ ] his strategy in the opposite direction,’ reselling the low-price contracts he purchased at a high price, or buying back the high-price contracts he sold at a low price. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:52 pm by David Friedman
A rational speculator might spend a million dollars acquiring information about future price movements whose social value is zero—his whole profit is coming at the expense of whomever would have held the goods when their price went up if he hadn't bought them first.The point is illustrated by a famous law case, Laidlaw v. [read post]