Search for: "The People v. Harper"
Results 301 - 320
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
First, it may be the case that Harper's penological interest standard is more accommodating to the government's interest than the medically appropriate standard offered in Riggins v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
" Here's more:A Stanford law professor who helped argue Rumsfeld v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Wang v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Kahle v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Barlow’s letter encapsulated the reasoning behind the idea of copyright as an incentive to promote knowledge: literary and intellectual works took a considerable amount of time and resources to produce, and given the great public benefits that flow from them, some way of encouraging people to devote their time and resources to producing them was needed. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Shipley, Conflicts Between Copyright and the First Amendment After Harper & Row, Publishers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
(See Harper’s excellent article on the history of the tax advantaged Google operation Keyword: Evil.) [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Diehr, 450 US 175, 187 (1981).Harper & Row v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Nonetheless, in Harper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
There are arguments made by credible people, such as Prof. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:13 am
Bush v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:13 am
Bush v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Terwilliger, 126 F.3d 34, 41 (2nd Cir. 1997).545 US 913, 961 (2005) (concurrence).For example, Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm
We are not speaking of the POLL tax, or the requirement of a fee to vote in elections, the Jim Crow-era attempts by some states to prevent minority groups from exercising their new 15th Amendment given right, which existed nationwide in federal elections until the 24th Amendment was ratified, and what took the Harper v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
Colb My Verdict column for this week is about Florence v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
Shaven head, tattoo, v-neck t-shirt. [read post]