Search for: "The Southwark"
Results 301 - 320
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2011, 5:29 am
Back to the present case - In October 2004, Southwark had sent a demand for c. [read post]
14 May 2011, 5:29 am
Back to the present case - In October 2004, Southwark had sent a demand for c. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
The tenancy agreement was not amended or supplemented by Southwark. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
The tenancy agreement was not amended or supplemented by Southwark. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it was extremely unlikely that the draughtsman of the 1995 Act had used the term enjoyment in a more extensive manner than that set out by the House of Lords in Southwark London Borough Council v Tanner & Others [2001] 1 AC. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
The Netherlands (App No 27677/02), and Anufrijeva v Southwark London Borough Council [2003] EWCA Civ 1406, [2004] QB 1124, and concluded that whilst art 8 was engaged, there had been no breach because: a) the interference was not sufficiently serious (being for a period of one year and interim measures had been put in place pending the conclusion of the appeal); and b) the breach of statutory duty was born of error rather than a lack of respect for… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
” At the same time – and apparently as part of the same phenomenon of the unease of the unChurched meddling in matters religious of which they knew little and cared less – a line of case law developed which denied ministers of religion access to any private law contractual remedies against the religious bodies employing their services, on the basis that any contract was made not with their specific religious institution but with the God they served, and hence not enforceable before… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) [2011] EWCA Civ 363 (04 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eagle v Redlime Ltd [2011] EWHC 838 (QB) (04 April 2011) Proteus Property Partners Ltd v South African Property Opportunities Plc [2011] EWHC 768 (QB) (30 March 2011) London Borough of Southwark v Connor & Ors [2011] EWHC 685 (QB) (23 March 2011) Leeds City Council v Price & Ors [2011] EWHC 849 (QB) (04 April 2011) High… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
High Court (Administrative Court) The Commission for Equality & Human Rights v Griffin & Ors [2011] EWHC 675 (Admin) (21 March 2011) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) London Borough of Southwark v IBM UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 653 (TCC) (21 March 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
The more substantive changes are these guidance on the length of grounds of appeal (UKSC PD3 para 3.1.2 and JCPC PD 3 para 3.1.2) and on chronologies in statements of facts and issues (UKSC PD 5 para 5.1.3 and JCPC PD 5 para 5.1.7); an express reference to the House of Lords’ Practice Statement of 26 July 1966 on judicial precedent and the passage in Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 making it clear that the statement still applies;… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Haddock, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 303 (07 February 2011) M, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 648 (18 March 2011) Takkar v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 646 (18 March 2011) Attorney Generals Reference No. 73, 75 & 03 of 2010 [2011] EWCA Crim 633 (03 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tradegro (UK) Ltd v Wigmore Street Investments Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 268 (16 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Stevenson & Ors v London Borough of… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) M v F & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 273 (17 March 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Johnson , Re [2011] EWHC 593 (Admin) (17 March 2011) Q, R (on the application of) v Q Constabulary & Anor [2011] EWHC 592 (Admin) (17 March 2011) Hinds, R (on the application of) v Blackpool Council [2011] EWHC 591 (Admin) (17 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) The Lorenz Consultancy Ltd. v Fox-Davies Capital Ltd. [2011] EWHC 574 (Ch) (17 March 2011) Carey Group Plc… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
“Southwark council, which became the first to obtain a court order against a gang member, is drawing up a list of more suspects. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:28 pm
[We have] probably 30 cases a year [against Southwark]” The CFAs set the level of success fee at a relatively modest 10%. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:06 am
“The former Labour MP Eric Illsley has been jailed for 12 months at Southwark crown court after pleading guilty to charges of false accounting concerning nearly £14,500 in parliamentary expenses. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:44 am
Earlier this year, the case of Saurav Ghai, the 2-year-old boy who was killed by a collapsing wall in January 2007, made headlines when Southwark Crown Court found Camden Council responsible for the death. [read post]
