Search for: "Thomas R Light" Results 301 - 320 of 1,879
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, Justice Clarence Thomas seemed to erect a pre-emptive defense. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:36 am by Josh Blackman
Confidential deliberations should remain confidential–especially when press reports paint some members of the Court in an unfavorable light. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 12:18 pm by Lee E. Berlik
About 10 years ago, hardwood flooring retailer Lumber Liquidators learned that its Chairman and largest shareholder, Thomas D. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
Wednesday, Jan. 15, 11:30 a.m.: The Atlantic Council will hold a conversation with Nabeel Khoury, a nonresident senior fellow, and Thomas L. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
-Japan defense relationship in light of China’s power on the global stage. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:35 am by Dave Wieneke
What I’m Reading: Thank You for Being Late by Thomas L. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is not clear whether any of this would have come to light were it not for the actions of a relatively junior CIA employee, who is now the target of almost daily attacks by Trump and efforts to make his identity public. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:48 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The court noted that the gap at issue was clearly visible, not overly large, and appeared to be a part of the design of the sidewalk.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to attorney Paraskevoula Mamounas, Esquire of the Allentown, Pennsylvania office of Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Judge Durkin ordered the parties to brief the issue whether he had “inherent authority” to abrogate the settlement in light of the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in the Walgreen case (about which refer here). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
" And last month, CRS declined to take a position on this question in light of the "significant academic debate about whether Office of Legal Counsel's conclusion [in its 2009 memorandum] comports with the original public meaning of the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]