Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
I wondered when I learned that Tom Goldstein is co-counsel for the petitioners when this petition would end up as a SCOTUSblog “Petition of the Day. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
O’Rourke, Nadine Strossen, Tom Goldstein, Judge Diane Sykes, Roger Pilon, and a host of others [details] Tweet Tags: Alex Kozinski, asbestos, attorneys general, Child Protective Services, jury nullification, Ohio, Philadelphia, Scotland, traffic lawsJuly 29 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:07 pm
Writing for this blog, Tom Goldstein discussed the likelihood that the Court will take up the issue, and – if so — how the Justices might rule. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:42 am
To anyone who follows the Supreme Court, the blog that lawyer Tom Goldstein started over a decade ago has become a must-read, not just for its wall-to-wall coverage of the court’s decisions, but in-depth analysis of those decisions and their impact. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Tom Goldstein and other Court observers think it is very unlikely he would upend the solution he apparently negotiated in Hobby Lobby. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
” At Harvard Law School’s Bill of Health blog, Gregory Curfman responds to Tom Goldstein’s post at this blog, in which Goldstein suggested that Justice Stephen Breyer may have joined the majority in last week’s order in the Wheaton College case because he “accomplished much more by joining the majority than by dissenting. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
Tom Goldstein and Marty Lederman debated the impact of the Wheaton College ruling on contraception coverage for Wheaton College students and employees (and, by extension, other religious non-profits' employees) over at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Lyle covered the Thursday order for this blog, with further analysis from both Marty Lederman and Tom Goldstein (here and here). [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
Tom Goldstein has the best hypothesis on this I’ve seen. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
As Tom Goldstein suggests, it appears HHS could prevail by altering some of the language on the form (particularly that which indicates contraception coverage will be provided) and allowing the objector to submit the form to the government instead of to the insurer or third-party administrator. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 10:43 am
[Originally published in slightly different form at SCOTUSblog, together with an excellent supplemental post by Tom Goldstein, as to which I've incorporated a couple of responses, noted herein.]By a 6-3 vote yesterday afternoon, the Supreme Court issued this interim order in an “ACA contraceptive coverage” case brought by a religious nonprofit organization, Wheaton College:If the applicant informs the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that it is a… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Tom Donnelly looks at the record of the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Harris. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Hobby Lobby wins before the Supreme Court, reports Tom Goldstein, at the highly reliable SCOTUSblog. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:33 am
As Tom Goldstein observed while live-blogging about the decision, the power to adjourn has never been tested. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
” Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog, and Tom Goldstein explained the ruling in Plain English. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
Here's Tom Goldstein on the ruling:It seems a shame to erect obstacles to access when organizations like ours share the values and further the goals of journalism. [read post]
