Search for: "Tomlinson v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
We have already posted a news report and part one of Hugh Tomlinson’s paper. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:13 am by Adam Wagner
Permission to appeal granted in Sharon Shoesmith v Ofsted and Ors case: Sharon Shoesmith was the leader of Haringey Council at the time of the Baby Peter affair in 2007. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
The subject of this little rant was the dispute in Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Dickinson
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am
Article 32 of Rome II states that: "This Regulation shall apply from 11 January 2009". [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Adam Wagner
” 22 July | Ian Tomlinson death: lawyers challenge CPS over decision not to prosecute: Ian Tomlinson was caught up in the G20 protests in April 2009. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Applying the House of Lords decision in Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA [2005] UKHL 43, Tomlinson J held that an error of law does not involve an excess of power under section 68(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am by John J Downes
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]