Search for: "U. S. v. Davis*#"
Results 301 - 320
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
Davis said the technology’s “advanced surveillance capabilities such as facial recognition, person tracking and gender identification” could threaten civil liberties and potentially national security. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
Last week’s grant in the cell-site data case Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
Fensterer, supra; Davis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Davis L. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Davis L. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) … [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) … [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” Estate of Davis v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
Crosby, 545 U. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Sims v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
” “To begin, the motion court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claims for gross negligence, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as duplicative of his legal malpractice claim, given that they are all based on the same facts and seek the same relief (Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
