Search for: "U. S. v. Fallings" Results 301 - 320 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:34 am by Derek T. Muller
There’s already been a lot written about the Court’s brief statement in Texas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in further en banc news, the Sixth Circuit will reconsider its decision that a Kentucky prosecutor's striking four African-American veniremen did not violate Batson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am by Peter Mahler
Court Grants Dissolution Petition Against Majority Shareholder Who Transferred Manhattan Restaurant’s Assets to His Separate Company for No Consideration Kocak v Dargin, 2020 NY Slip Op 33121(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 23, 2020]. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 12:45 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Im vorliegenden Fall insbesondere auch deshalb, weil dieser Schritt genau den Beitrag darstellt, der über den Stand der Technik hinausgeht. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:24 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs LLP v Frumkin  2020 NY Slip Op 33172(U) September 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160569/2013 Judge: Paul A. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Green’s and Pan-Oceanic’s liability had to rise and fall together because Pan-Oceanic admitted liability under respondeat superior. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm by Sara Chimene-Weiss, Helen White
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
The department’s adoption of the rule also failed arbitrary and capricious review, in the majority’s view, by not adequately considering the consequences of its significant departure from the previous interpretation of “public charge,” including, among other outcomes, the potential chilling effect on immigrants and family members who fall outside the rule’s scope. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Katharine Young
By 1977, a total of thirty-five states had ratified the ERA, falling short of the three-fourths of the states prescribed by Article V. [read post]