Search for: "U. S. v. Harris#"
Results 301 - 320
of 378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Its governance trajectories touch on the essence of law and the lawyer's craft; its normative trajectories speak to politics, ethics and morals, to the fundamental organization of cultures of human interactions in the economic sphere.First, it focuses on enterprises--that is on institutions organized for the purpose, principally, of economic activity. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
NGN are applying to strike out claims by Hugh Grant and Prince Harry on limitation grounds. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
[Signed] HARRY C. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Prince Harry has commenced libel proceedings against the Mail on Sunday over an article claiming that he has lost touch with the Royal Marines. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
This 9th Circuit's reasoning in Douglas was extended in Harris v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The unreported decision is Cole v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Pacific Fleet Admiral Harry Harris called China’s artificial island creation in the Spratlys a “great wall of sand. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:34 am
Maryland, 373 U. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:02 am
Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Yet, if courts follow the logic that underlies the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
See Antonin Scalia, Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
’)” Moseley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” If you misspell Harry Potter’s name—or put it in kanji—we’ve got you covered. [read post]
