Search for: "U. S. v. Marks" Results 301 - 320 of 1,463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, since “mere speculation of a loss resulting from an attorney’s alleged omissions … is insufficient to sustain a claim” for legal malpractice” (Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141AD3d405, 405-406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]), plaintiffs claim that she may have accepted a settlement offer had she known about it must fail for this reason as well. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
[For the record, 40-0 perfection has been achieved twice: by the women's b-ball teams at Baylor and U. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hills, P.C. v Holguin  2021 NY Slip Op 50032(U) [70 Misc 3d 135(A)] Decided on January 15, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department remain true. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:20 am by Shawn Dominy
U Can’t Touch This” – That’s what the trooper believed when he stopped Ryan Turner for touching the ‘fog line’ on Old State Route 74. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Para ello, es imprescindible que la parte demandante establezca mediante prueba los siguientes requisitos: 1) la existencia de una acción u omisión culposa o negligente; 2) la antijuricidad de la misma; 3) la producción de un daño; y 4) la relación causal entre la acción u omisión y el daño(14). [read post]