Search for: "U. S. v. Range" Results 301 - 320 of 860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere weigh in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
First, we ensure that the district judge committed no significant procedural error such as improperly calculating the Sentencing Guidelines range. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
George Osborne’s appointment as the editor of the Evening Standard this week “sparked responses ranging from the humorous to the incredulous“. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
  This question is likely still haunting Cisco following yesterday's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015).In a 6-2 vote (Justice Breyer was recused), the highest court in the United States overturned the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that held that the Cisco could run the "good faith" defence against Commil's claims that Cisco directly infringed its patent for a method of… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
S. ___, ___ (2017) (opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Baxter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm by Kurt R. Karst
”  Implant devices are used in a range of settings such as dental and orthopedic procedures. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Koons v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
Spinnato began receiving emails from ATT with GPS coordinates for Andrews's cell phone (within a range of a 200 to 1600 meter radius). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
In addition, APPA recommended in our comments an administrative mechanism for providing additional compliance time using the Title V permitting program that we believe is within U. [read post]