Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The lawyers are claiming that therefore the claim is barred under the Feres doctrine. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
Prometheus Radio Project & National Association of Broadcasters v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:40 am
Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:27 am
Hain argued that the federal OFPA preempted the “organic” claims. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm
Turning to alternative legal actions that Padilla had open to him, the Circuit Court said he had challenged his detention by the military repeatedly in federal habeas cases, in U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:15 pm
On February 23, 2022, the Federal Bar Association (FBA) kicked off its fifth annual Qui Tam Conference to highlight key areas for False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement in the coming year. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
The New York City Bar Association has solicited comments from its members about the pending nomination of 2nd Circuit Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, as the Association's Judiciary Committee customarily provides the views of the Association to the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of the confirmation process. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
The third case involves a fairly arcane issue of pleading claims under federal pension law. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:45 pm
Brown, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") preempts the West Virginia court's stated "public policy" because that policy prohibits the arbitration of a particular type of claim, a result clearly inconsistent with prior Supreme Court decisions interpreting the FAA. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:45 pm
Brown, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") preempts the West Virginia court's stated "public policy" because that policy prohibits the arbitration of a particular type of claim, a result clearly inconsistent with prior Supreme Court decisions interpreting the FAA. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:28 pm
District of Columbia – Wednesday, November 1: The interpretation of the federal law that allows (but does not require) federal courts to consider state-law claims related to the plaintiff’s federal claims, putting the statute of limitations for the state-law claims on hold while the case is pending in federal court. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:42 pm
Readers will recall that earlier this year, the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
The district court dismissed the complaint on the pleadings, and the Federal Circuit reversed except for the claims against individual executives sued in their personal capacity. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:40 pm
It has been used to bar habeas judges from second-guessing U.S. decisions on when a detainee may leave Guantanamo, and now, in the Trinidad y Garcia case, to bar a federal judge from second-guessing the Secretary of State’s rulings on when to allow an accused non-citizen to be sent home even in the face of a claim of potential torture. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
For the third time in recent weeks, and the fourth time this year, a federal court — this time a District Court judge in New York City — has struck down the 1996 federal law that barred legally married same-sex couples from obtaining any benefits available under federal law. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:04 pm
Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), bars claims that the manufacturer withheld information from the FDA. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Given the extreme rarity of a life imprisonment without parole sentence imposed on a 13-year-old child for a non-homicide and the unavailability of substantive review in any other federal court, should this Court grant review of a recently evolved Eighth Amendment claim where the state court has refused to do so? [read post]
