Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 301 - 320 of 8,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
But the constraints on public prosecutors, which we saw in connection with United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
”   Sandra’s mother, Ada Mae, was the college-educated daughter of a prosperous Texas merchant and rancher. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm by Suhre & Associates
Some States Ban OVI Checkpoints, While Others Have Ruled They Are Constitutional  Texas banned these checkpoints directly due to their interpretation of the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
The November 25, 2023 Journal op-ed, which was written by former U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
A significant number of U.S. states recognize the distinction between separate property and marital property in the event of a divorce. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This Fifth Circuit ruling is remarkable, not so much for its holding that a Texas man had a qualified right to confront witnesses against him in a hearing to revoke his supervised release, but for Judge Ho's concurring opinion, which is basically an amicus brief addressed to the Supreme Court's pending ruling in the Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm by Ilya Somin
This case ended up in federal court in the first place, because—after the plaintiffs initially filed in state court—the state of Texas removed the case to federal court under 28 U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Insulation supplier and contractor 51.8% Estimate over 400 million – JM Insulation – Southern California U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]