Search for: "U.S. v. Witt" Results 301 - 320 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Wittes conceded that he is now alarmed by the lack of progress in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:51 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies summarized oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Kerr argued that Microsoft should have challenged the All Writs Act instead of the Stored Communications Act in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm by Ad Law Defense
  See No. 16-668, 2017 WL 4339924 (U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm by Ad Law Defense
  See No. 16-668, 2017 WL 4339924 (U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by Vanessa Sauter
    ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr and Benjamin Wittes hosted a Facebook “live” with initial reactions following oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Marshals Service related to his arrest and forced witness testimony before the military commission trying U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Sarah Grant summarized the military commission proceedings at the Nov. 7 hearing in U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by Scott Harman
On the Oct. 17 episode of the Lawfare Podcast, Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes sparred over how concerned one should be about the incommunicado detention in Iraq of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:20 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn posted the government’s reply brief in ACLU v. [read post]