Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
 The question in the case is  whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
Smith has described immigration as “literally like an invasion, something you would normally think you would see on Red Dawn” that will cause the United States to “lose our country . . . [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Just as critics at the time feared, the new doctrine swept across the national landscape, invalidating the districting maps in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Postal Service (Feb. 20): Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
And what should the United States be doing about it? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
Teva Pharmaceuticals [docket; cert. petition, PDF] is whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as “prior art” for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Russell Beck
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]