Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
The measures are intended to add an extra layer of control over who can access the data of European uses. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe ¶ 28; Davis). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm
Congratulations to Jeremy Chase of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, who represents defendants. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:04 pm
District Court for the Northern District of New York (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
” After attempting to negotiate a settlement failed, the EEOC filed its lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ogles Acknowledges Misrepresenting His College Major MSN – John Wagner (Washington Post) | Published: 2/27/2023 Showdown Before the Raid: FBI agents and prosecutors argued over Trump MSN – Carol Leonnig, Devlin Barrett, Perry Stein, and Aaron Davis (Washington Post) | Published: 3/1/2023 Months of disputes between Justice Department prosecutors and FBI agents over how best to try to recover classified documents from Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club and… [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
Bumper tap lawyers love Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” Carroll v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
Federal prisoner Quartavious Davis asserted that his trial lawyer rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance for not pursuing a plea deal for him, causing him to receive a sentence many times longer than his co-defendants who pleaded guilty. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The second new relist, Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Davis, No. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
The use of implied terms or unjust enrichment to fill the gaps in the parties’ agreement split the Supreme Court and the courts below. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
” This definition thus used the singular to describe the study and to describe the range of values. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
Davis. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
The Supreme Court (by a majority) says yes, but only for a ‘particular and exceptional use of land’. [read post]
