Search for: "US v. Flowers"
Results 301 - 320
of 767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
Sunday napTrade marks Banksy’s trade mark, depicting the “Flower thrower”, has been declared invalid due to bad faith by the EUIPO. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 3:00 pm
Judge Carlos Bea United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Idaho Contractors Board, 19-66, which likewise involves the validity of Smith, as well as Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In addition he himself trampled the flower bed in response to her intervention. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
The court reasoned that because the metal strip was used to hedge a flower bed near the restaurant and was considerably separated from the pedestrian entranceway, it had a reasonable, useful, and non-dangerous function. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Pumpkin by Flowers by Walter As summer gives way to autumn and the golden leaves tumble, the prettiest flowers are those that come the florists -- which brings the IPKat on to today's decision in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
Omega SA v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:35 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Robin Maher writes that although “[t]he decision [in Flowers v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm
Steven Lehotsky represents NFIB and SG Ben Flowers represents Ohio. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 12:46 am
Flowers, 547 U.S. ___ (Apr. 26, 2006), the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
They argue that the court’s errors are reminiscent of those the Supreme Court found to constitute reversible error in 2019’s Flowers v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Flowers, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
In Carson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:23 am
Amodio's Garden Center and Flower Shop Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Defendant urges us to affirm summary judgment, but contends that the court abused its discretion in reducing the award of fees.Roberts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Briefly: At the Stanford Law Review, Thomas Ward Frampton urges a second look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ controversial dissent in Flowers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
The question the Court is asked to consider is did the lower courts in law by not holding that the hip replacement product used for the Appellant’s hip replacement was defective within the terms of the Consumer Protection Act 1987? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm
The next case on their docket on the issue – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
