Search for: "US v. Holt"
Results 301 - 320
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 8:17 pm
The case is of interest to employment lawyers in the public sector primarily because of the court’s analysis of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a “sister statute” to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and one which allows individuals “to seek religious accommodations pursuant to the same standard as set forth in RFRA,” in light of the similarities to employers seeking to apply a grooming and appearance policy to their employees… [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The ACLU will continue to work with Congress to stop the government's spying on innocent people as well as force disclosure about how these programs are used and the secret court rulings that support them. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:59 am
Holt, 134 S.W.3d 830, 834 (Tenn. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Civil Liberties website: Writing in McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Muslim Inmate Objects to Strip Search with Transgender Female-to-Male Guard Watching
10 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
" In Holt v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Abstract The use of humour by judicial officers is subject to formal and informal regulation. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
The only thing in common is the use of the term itself. they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 3:14 pm
From Anonymous Plaintiff 1 v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
This double standard used by WAPF is inherently biased, and could mislead consumers. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
-FLORIS 901 NORTH US HIGHWAY FLORISSANT, MO-Missouri 90 COUNTRY MART 15720 US HIGHWAY 160 FORSYTH MO-Missouri 91 COUNTRY MART 208 LINCOLN DRIVE FREDERICKTOWN MO-Missouri 92 Moser's Discount Foods 1401 N. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:40 am
It vacated, however, the lower court’s nationwide injunction that prohibited BNSF from engaging in certain hiring practices, finding the court below needed to make adequate factual findings to support the injunction’s scope (EEOC v. [read post]
