Search for: "US v. Johnson" Results 301 - 320 of 6,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
However, a dog sniff is used to detect criminal wrongdoing is not an ordinary incident to a traffic stop. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Antitrust Trade Regulation Unfair Competition Misleading Statements False Advertising Design Defect and Failure-to-Warn Theories of Liability The FDA Did Not Create a Safe Harbor Statute of Limitations Tolling Agreement Consumer Law Drugs & Biotech Health Law California Law   Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., and Ethicon US, LLC (collectively, Ethicon) appeal an adverse judgment following a… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:49 pm
Co-blogger Will Baude recently blogged about the Supreme Court’s unusual re-argument order in Johnson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon still face thousands of cases over transvaginal mesh implants, which are used to treat bladder incontinence and pelvic prolapse. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The key issue before the courts in these cases is therefore whether the breach of an express term committed in connection with an employee’s dismissal falls within the principle established in Johnson V Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 (that is, an employee may not claim damages for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence where the circumstances that gave rise to the breach related only to the manner in which the employee had been dismissed, referred to as the… [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 am by Taylor Isaac
The case comes after the court's 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:58 am by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
“Despite the narrow FDA-approved indications for Risperdal, Janssen developed and executed marketing and sales plans designed to promote Risperdal for uses that had not been established to be safe and/or effective and to minimize the many risks associated with Risperdal's use,” Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
On my way to writing a post applying the UK Supreme Court’s decision on the Boris Johnson prorogation to the City of Toronto decision upholding the province’s reduction of wards, I decided to take a detour to examine the College of Midwives of British Columbia v. [read post]