Search for: "US v. Lloyd" Results 301 - 320 of 1,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 2:36 pm by James Kachmar
  For instance, nearly 50 years ago in the case, Lloyd Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
It is reported that Wissam Al Mana, a Qatari billionaire and ex-husband to US singer Janet Jackon, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Facebook after a dubious crypto project used his photo in ads on the platform Pakistan Fackebook, Twitter and Google are robustly responding to the Pakistan Government’s attempted censorship. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Interested readers should email conference@5RB.com Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Interested readers should email conference@5RB.com Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2020 the BBC had a piece on the UK’s decision to let Huawei continue to be used in its 5G networks but with restrictions, despite pressure from the US to block the firm. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  Interested readers should email conference@5RB.com Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:39 am by INFORRM
The application for permission to appeal in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC is pending before the Supreme Court and is expected to be determined this term. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Interested readers should email conference@5RB.com Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 1:44 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the loan was funded by the parties' illegal gambling operation (for which both were criminally prosecuted), the record does not support a characterization of their conduct as "malum in se, or evil in itself" (Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124, 128 [1992]) and the source of funds used for a loan is not typically a factor in determining its validity. [read post]
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will determine the validity of the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillan Schrems) whilst the General Court of the EU will consider the future of Privacy Shield (La Quadrature du Net v Commission). [read post]
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will determine the validity of the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillan Schrems) whilst the General Court of the EU will consider the future of Privacy Shield (La Quadrature du Net v Commission). [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police and Others [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) The decision of the Administrative Court that the police’s use of facial recognition software was lawful. [read post]