Search for: "US v. Morales"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:41 am
June 20, 2007) (available here), and US v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
Andrew Ross Sorkin is waiving his arms about the Starr v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
Erica VaccarelloBy the end of June, the US Supreme Court will have ruled on the registrability of scandalous and immoral marks in Iancu (USPTO) v Brunetti (No. 18-302). [read post]
8 May 2007, 6:03 am
Gonzales and Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 11:30 am
Plus, you gotta love any opinion that uses the term "turpitudinous". [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:52 am
Moral Majority, Inc., 796 F.2d 1148, 1150 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:37 pm
See, e.g., McGowan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Beckering v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:38 am
Their sense of right and wrong, morality and immorality, derives from their life experience, and if there is anyone from whom one derives their sense of morality, it’s a priest (used in a non-denominational sense). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:51 pm
V. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
Socio-economic factors lead us to another related mitigating factor, i.e. the ability of the guilty to reform. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
Texas does not encompass the right of consenting adults to use sex toys has now been challenged by the 5th Circuit in Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
This latest decision, February 14, affirms the ruling by the district court that the public morality concerns of the Alabama legislature remain a sufficient rational justification to sustain the law, even after Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 1:08 am
To simplify: it helps us all avoid becoming child rapists by being viscerally repulsed by child rape. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:46 am
I wonder if these folks have heard of Chicago V. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
In People v O’Farrell, it was held that when there are two or more accomplices to the same crime, the testimony of one accomplice may not be used to corroborate another. [read post]
