Search for: "US v. Owen" Results 301 - 320 of 959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
To do so, it adopted a metric similar to that developed by Alex Reinert, who showed in an important paper that settlements should count as successes and that litigants succeed at a much higher rate in Bivens litigation than the conventional wisdom would have us believe. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:36 am by Steve Kalar
  Happily, the government now gets a second bite at the Brady apple.United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard, Noah Feldman, has given us a thoroughly researched, well-written, solid analysis of the inner workings of the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
It provides us freedom to do what we need to do to have a sustainable innovation policy and bring wealth and wellbeing to Canadians. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
It provides us freedom to do what we need to do to have a sustainable innovation policy and bring wealth and wellbeing to Canadians. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
https://t.co/JRHgYW0gbc pic.twitter.com/W3J22s0RMl — Resolution (@ResFamilyLaw) March 31, 2017 Owens v Owens: Court of Appeal has refused permission to appeal to Supreme Court (to whom an application must now be made) #nofaultdivorce — PJM QC (@pjm1kbw) March 31, 2017 Possible sign of movement on #nofaultdivorce? [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Media reports we found notably balanced, accurate or otherwise helpful to transparency this week Rachel Johnson’s report of Owens v Owens for the Daily Mail, as acknowledged here by Jo Edwards of Resolution: Spot on re #nofaultdivorce & urgent need for reform @RachelSJohnson (even if some reader comments are out of touch) https://t.co/WIgMtSHOAg — Jo Edwards (@MissJoEdwards) March 26, 2017 A cluster of constructive local press reports about social work… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by John R. Phillips
’”  The 10th Circuit believed that § 2462 used “forfeiture” in a narrow historical sense—as “an in rem procedure to take ‘tangible property used in criminal activity. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Inside Sources, Ryan Owens discusses Monday’s decision in in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]