Search for: "US v. Paul Davis"
Results 301 - 320
of 494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
Which to Use, and When? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Davis Law Review. 26 (1993) : 791-851. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Ann Murphy, whose former fiancee hid explosives in her flight luggage without her knowledge in 1986, has brought a defamation claim against the US-based Slate.com in the Irish High Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Davis (11-714), on redistricting the state senate, and Perry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
" Wendy Davis' writeup [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:50 am
Mayor Judy Paul of Davie made the decision that the asbestos-laden pipes in a closed mobile home park had got to go. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Davis, 499 N.E.2d 1255, 1259 (Ohio Ct. 1985); Pestrak v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Davis, 499 N.E.2d 1255, 1259 (Ohio Ct. 1985); Pestrak v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
More information about US shield laws on the Seattle Weekly site here. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
Davis, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:56 pm
" As part of the scheme, as alleged by plaintiff Ohio National, defendants Douglas Davis, Mavash Morady, and Paul Morady "obtained life insurance policies using the identities of senior citizens, transferred the policies to themselves through trusts, then sold the policies to investors. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
16 Ocean & CoastalL.J. 47-113 (2010).Kibel, Paul Stanton. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Paul Staines, who runs the blog, will now be required to appear before the Inquiry. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
Court for the Northern Dist. of Texas and Davis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Murdoch’s evidence (uncorrected transcript PDF here) provided plenty of material for comment and analysis: Paul Farrelly MP probed him on the Gordon Taylor case; Watson revealed the details of his conversation with former chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck; and Philip Davies MP questioned Murdoch’s management decisions. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit (and a few others have follow) includes the following factors to be used: (1) how strong is the plaintiff’s showing of discriminatory effect; (2) is there some evidence of discriminatory intent, though not enough to satisfy the constitutional standard of Washington v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit (and a few others have follow) includes the following factors to be used: (1) how strong is the plaintiff’s showing of discriminatory effect; (2) is there some evidence of discriminatory intent, though not enough to satisfy the constitutional standard of Washington v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
In a concurrence, Justice John Paul Stevens called the office’s violations “blatant and repeated. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Davis, Jonathan R. [read post]
