Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm
(David Bernstein) My contribution to Scotusblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
To be sure, Nixon v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:16 am
Cady v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
As recounted in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
Powell et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am
This case arises from the defendants' public comments about Smartmatic and their claims that this company's software caused former President Trump to lose the 2020 election.The case is Smartmatic USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
In Oregon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:36 am
Powell not even cited in this 2254 habeas case.] [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
Furman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
He relied on a useful encapsulation of the law by Slade J in Powell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 1:39 pm
 Email us at SCOTUSblog.feedback@gmail.com to let us know your thoughts on this new feature! [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
Articulating a Standard: The Powel Decision In the seminal case of Powel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:43 pm
Justice Powell, writing for the majority in McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
My article argued that, in my experience as an NGO person debating with US military lawyers about a wide variety of human rights and law of war matters over a couple of decades, the peculiarity of the US military lawyer was a preference to treat such matters not as a matter of moral vision, but of "merely" technical lawyering, apolitical technical legal matters, and negotiation of the the US national security interest. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:25 pm
Jumbo Interactive Ltd & New South Wales Lotteries Corp v Elot, Inc. [2011] APO 82 (28 October 2011) Opposition – claims to a computer-implemented system for use in operating a lottery – whether claims novel – whether claims inventive – whether claims useful – whether claims satisfy requirements of section 40 of the Patents Act 1990 – whether claims relate to a ‘manner of manufacture’ Once again, a hearing officer… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Deck v. [read post]
