Search for: "US v. Richard Jackson" Results 301 - 320 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” (Reminiscent of Richard Nixon’s Watergate-era speech in which he said, “I am not a crook. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The issue concerns the decision of the High Court to refer issues concerning the validity of EU decisions approving the EU-US data transfer channels to the CJEU. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was moderated by Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Stanford Center for Racial Justice, along with the following Stanford Law faculty panelists: Easha Anand, Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Richard Thompson Ford, George E. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Richard Gonzales Samayoa v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:15 am by Steve Hall
Louis attorney Richard Sindel made a similar argument on behalf of Barnett. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
A case worth noting, from the end of January: in Heafield v Times Newspaper Ltd [2013] UKEAT (17 January 2013), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the use of bad language about the Pope did not constitute harassment within the meaning of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
President Biden has issued an Executive Order titled, “Protecting Access to Reproductive Health Care Services,” in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization that overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Rather than repeat the same comforting boilerplate, Richards should have been honest with the American people. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
As law professor Richard Hasen notes here, Moore is the first time the Justices have cited Bush v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
This third installment will consider how “obstruction of justice” can serve as the predicate for “high Crimes,” with respect to the impeachments of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: In their historic ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am by Ralf Michaels
A US project guided by Richard Suskind collects cases of so-called “remote courts” worldwide. [read post]