Search for: "US v. Rodriguez"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Showcased most prominently in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:09 am
For example, the plaintiff in Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
According to the DominicanToday.com, December 7, 2009, the DEA and US Governments were aware that an alleged drug trafficker was present in the Dominican Republic; the Government of the D.R. was fully cooperative, but has no explanation for why the US was dilatory in following through with the extradition request. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:39 am
Rodriguez, No. 07-0900/MC. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
As with another recent case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
CA3: Police were objectively reasonable in entering a house they thought was abandoned but it wasn't
8 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 186 (1990). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:43 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:19 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
Rodriguez, a case I blogged about here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
N.A., 2021 WL 1299038, 2021 US Dist LEXIS 67477 [SD NY 2021], affd 2022 WL 1150626, 2022 US App LEXIS 10479 [2d Cir 2022]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
N.A., 2021 WL 1299038, 2021 US Dist LEXIS 67477 [SD NY 2021], affd 2022 WL 1150626, 2022 US App LEXIS 10479 [2d Cir 2022]). [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
As the Court held in People v Lyon, AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 06892 [10/01/10], where "a defendant's testimony conflicts with evidence precluded by a Sandoval ruling, "the defense opens the door' on the issue in question, and the [defendant] is properly subject to impeachment by the prosecution's use of the otherwise precluded evidence" (People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646; see People v Rodriguez, 85 NY2d 586, 591). [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:36 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Rodriguez-Preciado, 399 F.3d 1118, 1128-29(9th Cir. 2005); see also Wyrick v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
In Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
In her 2008 account to the wife, V. said that after Rodriguez left to go to the store, Cayetano–Jaimes told her sister to have V. come to his room. [read post]
