Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
See Lesiak v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
I have this strange feeling of déjà vu. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
This is a strange argument in the context of the ministerial exception. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:16 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
According to the DominicanToday.com, December 7, 2009, the DEA and US Governments were aware that an alleged drug trafficker was present in the Dominican Republic; the Government of the D.R. was fully cooperative, but has no explanation for why the US was dilatory in following through with the extradition request. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
In a 1981 case, Edwards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
In a 1981 case, Edwards v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Sci., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
Cacchillo v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The case is Lubov v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
On its face, this is somewhat strange. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Perez-Acevedo v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
In Coker v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
There are lots more cases recognizing broad preemption in product liability cases involving pre-market approved (PMA) medical devices than refusing to, but strange things happen in tort preemption cases, so we don't view anything - especially in state court - as a sure thing.Blog reader Alan Lazarus over at Drinker Biddle has just (and we do mean just) sent us a favorable PMA preemption opinion, Blanco v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:05 pm
Not to take things too lightly, but I had a chance to watch Strange Brew again this week, and I noted a surprising amount of legal content: re: the mouse in the bottle that started it all, see M'Alister (or donoghue) v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 As Bob and Doug make their initial claim for free beer, Bob informs us “Its in the Canadian Criminal Code” At several moments, Doug expresses awareness of the legal consequences of whatever ill-considered… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Additional Resources: Carlson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
’ ” Zivotofsky v. [read post]
