Search for: "USA v. Edwards"
Results 301 - 320
of 366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Since the decision in New York Times v Sullivan public figures cannot sue for defamation unless they can establish malice. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-1085; USA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
June 2, 2004); Edwards v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:58 am
(1) Cavell USA (2) Kenneth Edward Randall v (1) Seaton Insurance (2) Stonewall Insurance [2009] EWCA Civ 1363, concerned the construction of a Termination and Release Agreement, which provided for English law and jurisdiction and, under clause 13, for a full release by Randall from "all actions, causes of action, suits, claims and demands whatsoever, whether at law or equity…save…(iii) in the case of fraud" on Randall's part. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:32 am
District Judge Edward J. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-1891; USA v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-1891; USA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
(patent infringement) 11/17: Edwards Lifesciences AG and Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
Comer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Shatzer (08-680), arguing that it will require the Court to create a bright-line rule clarifying its decision in Edwards v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Then, the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2007 in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Organon USA, Inc., 2007 WL 4365312 (D.N.J. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Weymouth, MA; Anne Hilbert, President) Aerosoft Usa, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:42 am
USA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf]See Electronic Briefs in Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
