Search for: "United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions… [read post]
Google, Inc., a case from 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit examined whether an individual actor or actress may claim copyright in his or her performance in a motion picture. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  Much of the guidance issued by OSHA during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has originated from guidance from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Tomorrow: An alternative—narrow, specifically defined exceptions for particular kinds of speech. [1] Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by Marie Louise
New Zealand hit with first online infringement warnings (Ars Technica)   Spain Apple loses iPad design lawsuit against small Spanish tablet computer maker NT-K (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) Piracy may boost sales, judge concludes (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Guilty verdict in record-breaking Swedish file-sharing case (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Premium rate service regulator to help combat pirated music sales (Out-Law) Lady GaGa v Lady Goo Goo – Court orders… [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            Second, reversion to Title resurrects the view that the FCC can compartmentalize Internet technologies into an air tight, mutually exclusive dichotomy of telecommunications services and information services, [11] despite market and technological convergence. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            Second, reversion to Title resurrects the view that the FCC can compartmentalize Internet technologies into an air tight, mutually exclusive dichotomy of telecommunications services and information services, [11] despite market and technological convergence. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
But in subsequent decisions, the Court embraced a more nuanced approach: First, in United States v. [read post]