Search for: "United States District Courts (Alaska and California)"
Results 301 - 320
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
That was the question before a jury as it began deliberations yesterday in a case in San Francisco federal district court. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
The Court struck this down as a "fundamental change in our preexisting governmental plan," because it shifted the power to define the rights of criminal defendants under the California Constitution from the California Supreme Court to the United States Supreme Court, a court that has, under our federal system, no authority to interpret and apply state constitutions. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:36 pm
At least 41 United States District Courts now require compliance with special local rules, forms or guidelines addressing the discovery of electronically stored information. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 11:24 am
119 7 Fighting Foreclosure in Court How Long Can You Delay the Sale of Your House? [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 11:24 am
119 7 Fighting Foreclosure in Court How Long Can You Delay the Sale of Your House? [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:49 pm
("Hitachi Home Electronics") is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 900 Hitachi Way, Chula Vista, California. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
’ – 18 – 22 June, US/Alaska: (Public Knowledge), Center for IP 8th Annual IP Symposium – 28-30 May, Maryland US: (Public Knowledge), University of Maastricht: Conference on public health, innovation and intellectual property – 15 April, Maastricht (Netherlands): (IPR-Helpdesk), NLSIU Symposium: ‘Challenges to India’s patent regime’ – 12-13 April: (Spicy IP), Anti-counterfeiting and… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
It would be an abuse of discretion for a district court to deviate from the U.S.S.G. on the basis of sentencing disparity, resulting from fast track programs, that was intended by Congress. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
California Appellate Districts, April 01, 2008 Tosi v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:41 am
Yet in either case, it is not unthinkable -- maybe even likely -- that an individual District Court judge could find the analysis insufficiently explained pursuant to the Federal APA, and on that basis, remand the biological permit (and thus delay the power plant) for further review. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:36 am
At least 38 United States District Courts now require compliance with special local rules, forms or guidelines addressing the discovery of electronically stored information. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:36 pm
At least 37 United States District Courts now require compliance with special local rules, forms or guidelines addressing the discovery of electronically stored information. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
The District Court of Alaska held that USACE had acted according to the law and the permit was valid. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
The District Court of Alaska held that USACE had acted according to the law and the permit was valid. [read post]
