Search for: "United States Fidelity " Results 301 - 320 of 1,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Lessig powerfully argues that a translation process both describes and justifies judicial practice in the United States for more than two hundred years. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Why wouldn’t one prefer legal fidelity if there were no side costs? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by JB
Supreme Court attempt to achieve fidelity to meaning in changed circumstances consistent with fidelity to their role as judges. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Judges swear an oath to “this Constitution,” the written Constitution of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
His argument is that the practice and evolution of “constitutionalism” (p. 5) can be explained and normatively justified with reference to two kinds of judicial fidelity: fidelity to meaning and fidelity to role. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Ken Kersch, Conservatives and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Gary LawsonI came of intellectual age in the Southern California libertarian hotbed of the late 1970s. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:11 am by John Jascob
The panelists included David Forman, Chief Legal Officer, Fidelity Brokerage Services; Mark Weitjen, Managing Director, DTCC; and Neha Narula, Director, MIT Media Lab. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
If ideological fidelity were the driver of conservatives’ take on the case, he would have been lionized. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am by John Floyd
  To hold otherwise would mean that the President of the United States is “above the rule of law” – and if a court ever renders such a judicial interpretation, then America is no longer a democracy but a dictatorship. [read post]
§ 1512(c), they argue, would exempt Trump’s actions because the statute does not clearly state that it covers presidents; the statute’s text instead covers corruptly motivated obstructive acts by “[w]hoever” commits them. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Essentially, no Americans try to emigrate out of the United States while millions of people from around the world try to immigrate to the United States. [read post]