Search for: "United States et al v. Smith"
Results 301 - 320
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:02 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 pm
Glass et al 2020 ONCA 833. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
(The other sex offender case the Court has on its decision docket, but not yet scheduled for argument, is United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
CATALINA HALNAT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC, et. al. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Newport News School Bd, et al. , 2023 Va. [read post]
