Search for: "United States of America v. Page" Results 301 - 320 of 1,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
Amicus, Amici, America, Oh My! [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
United States (case page forthcoming), for a total of one hour of argument. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
  The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.Take, for example, the 1st Amendment of the United States of America. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
  The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.Take, for example, the 1st Amendment of the United States of America. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
On September 30, 2021, the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided a much-anticipated copyright reversion case involving the slasher franchise, Friday the 13th. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(Ars Technica) Hot news strikes again: site struggling after court decision: theflyonthewall.com case (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Policing priority: Nintendo escapes liability based on patentee’s failure to satisfy the written description requirement: Anascape, Ltd v Nintendo of America Inc. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Asset Marketing Inc., No. 05-CV-00633 (S.D.Cal.), filed in March 2005, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and certified as a state-wide class action (covering a class that “partially overlaps the Negrete class”) in July 2006; Mooney v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Holly
March 2, 2023   |   By: David Ludwig   Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm by Wells Bennett
New York (state legislatures cannot set maximum hours in particular industries); and Korematsu v. [read post]