Search for: "United States v. Bailes"
Results 301 - 320
of 799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Defendant Seeking to Appeal Resentence After Remand Granted Continued Release on Bail Pending Appeal United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
The local Texas government unit argues that it should be allowed to “bail out” from coverage by so-called Section 5, under a special exemption procedure the law includes. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:47 am
Let's take a look.In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
The judge who refused Dotcom bail said he could not assess whether the United States had a strong enough case against Dotcom, nor whether he had a good defense. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause, the United States Supreme Court first asks whether the asserted individual interests are encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of life, liberty or property. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:50 am
Pursuant to this statute, the requesting government is able to admit into evidence any document whatsoever through the simple device of annexing the document to a certification by the principal diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in that country. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
Applying due process principles under Montana state law as well as United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
With United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
Reference was also made to Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38, where inadequate medical records, lack of recourse to specialist psychiatric input, segregation and punishment were found to amount to degrading treatment in respect of a mentally ill person. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 3:35 am
The Supreme Court approved that practice in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
